|
|
Demonstrating indications that a loss of benefits has occurred is mandatory, and cannot be based solely on the calculation of probabilities or a subjective assessment. entrepreneurs This was confirmed by the Supreme Court in its judgment of April, reference number III CSK / In its justification, the court stated that there was no doubt that liability for hypothetical damage required demonstrating with a very high probability, bordering on certainty, that the benefits whose loss was to be compensated would have been achieved if it were not for the event causing the damage.
The evaluation criterion is a comparison of the actual course of events and their hypothetical course, reconstructed excluding the cause of the damage. Both subjective and objective premises are taken into account, proving the subjective and objective possibility of achieving benefits. Demonstrating only the philippines photo editor chance of achieving them. obtaining is not sufficient. Material liability for entrusted property. to an employee with the obligation to return it or to settle it.
It may be money, securities or valuables, tools and instruments or similar items, as well as personal protective equipment and clothing. and work shoes and other items: mobile phone, laptop, monitor, car, etc. - it can be any item owned by the entrepreneur and entrusted to an employee for use. For damage to the entrusted property, the employee is liable in full, regardless of whether the damage was caused intentionally or unintentionally. The employee may be released from financial liability if proves that the damage was caused by reasons beyond his control, Article of the Labor Code.
|
|
发表于 2023-12-10 13:44:33
